The 3-Checkpoint Assessment helps companies clarify what the product must do, what work needs to happen, and what the next engineering commitment is likely to cost.
Use this when the project is real, but the next step is not defined well enough to quote, build, rescue, or hand off.
The team knows what the product should become, but the must-have requirements, constraints, interfaces, or operating conditions are not fully defined.
Meetings keep circling the same questions because there is not yet a clear document that separates assumptions from decisions.
If the quote is based on weak inputs, the budget and schedule are likely to be wrong before the work even starts.
These documents reduce confusion before larger engineering commitments. They do not replace execution. They make execution less risky.
A PRD defines what the product must do, what conditions it must survive, and what constraints matter before design work is expanded.
A SOW turns the technical problem into defined work: deliverables, responsibilities, dependencies, and boundaries.
A quote is only useful when it is built on realistic scope. This checkpoint helps connect technical reality to budget reality.
Celtic reviews the status of the project and recommends the lowest-friction next step.
Share where the project is stuck, what is at risk, and what documents or decisions already exist.
The goal is to identify whether the project needs a PRD, SOW, quote, review, or direct rescue conversation.
The recommendation may be small. The point is to reduce drift before more money is committed.
If there is a fit, Celtic can help move from uncertainty into definition, troubleshooting, or execution.
Use this form as a short status report. Do not over-polish it. The goal is to tell Celtic enough to recommend the next practical move.